With that quetion in mind, I read the excellent comprehensive treatise on the fiction and the theory of time travel: Paul J. Nahin’s Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction (second edition). I give it five stars for sure! I don’t think that Nahin gives a concise definition of what he considers to be time travel, although he does give some negative examples and he rejects a quote from H. Bruce Franklin that “when one says time travel, what one really means is an extraordinary dislocation of someone’s consciousness in time.”
So, here’s my attempt at a definition:
Time travel is any backwards or discontinuous occurrence of the usual situation of cause preceding effect.That’s my definition, and I’ sticking to it. In order to be considered time travel, moving to the future must be discontinuous: I am here and now, then without occupying the intervening time, I am at some future time. Anything going backwards is time travel. So, some examples that are gnerally not time travel:
For the most part, if the characters of the story believe that the events in the story actually happened in their own world, then I shall trust the story is not a dream or travel to a separate world&mdashso, yay for Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court! Oh, and any comic books after 1969 that purport to have time travel are wrong. This is because after that date, everything in comic books was time travel, which is logically equivalent to nothing being time travel.
Please enjoy! —Michael Main (main@colorado.edu)